I used to believe the upload button was the work. Write the track, bounce the master, pick the cover, add the tags, publish, wait. If the track was good, the system would notice; if it was honest, the right people would arrive; if I stayed consistent, the numbers would follow.
That story is comforting because it makes the platform feel like a neutral pipe. SoundCloud never was a pipe. It is a room, and rooms do not reward volume; they reward presence.
The Problem
The first problem is not visibility. It is the mental model.
When you think you are publishing into a catalog, you optimize for output: quantity, cadence, polish. You treat the platform like a warehouse and hope the right customer walks in. When you realize you are publishing into a room, you start asking different questions: who is already here, what are they listening for, what do they consider respectful, what do they consider noise, and when are they actually awake?
Upload-and-wait is a polite way to disappear
Uploading and waiting feels virtuous. It feels like doing it “the right way”. No pushing, no messaging, no awkward self promotion, just craft. But platforms do not interpret your restraint as integrity; they interpret it as absence, and absence is not neutral.
The harsh part is that you can spend years getting better at the wrong game. You can improve your sound while your system stays broken. And the system breaks quietly. It just returns silence. That silence taught me SoundCloud is not primarily an audio platform; it is a social platform that happens to carry audio. That framing instantly explains why some mediocre tracks travel far and some beautiful tracks sit still. Not because the world is unfair, but because social systems route attention through people.
SoundCloud behaves like a graph, not a library
A library helps you find items. A graph helps items find each other through relationships. Comments, likes, reposts, follows, messages: these are not garnish, they are the engine.
I wrote about SoundCloud’s interface nudges years ago in Soundcloud made changes (and they are not just colors). What mattered to me was never the colors; it was what the colors were trying to make me do. That is the real product.
Every platform has two layers:
- The visible layer: buttons, feeds, menus, notifications.
- The behavioral layer: what those buttons train you to do, repeatedly, without thinking.
If you are serious about shipping anything into a social system, you have to learn to see both layers.
“Reach” is an attractive lie
Reach is clean. It is countable. It fits in a screenshot. Presence is messy. Presence requires you to show up when nothing is guaranteed. It requires taste, patience, and the humility to be ignored without spiraling. So we default to reach because reach feels like progress.
This is where the operator mindset matters. An operator does not worship metrics. An operator uses them like instruments, and also knows when an instrument is lying.
Followers can be a lie, not because followers are bad, but because they can be misaligned. Misalignment shows up later, after the dopamine has already been cashed. You feel it when you publish something you are proud of and the room stays quiet. Or worse, the room reacts, but with the wrong kind of reaction. A shallow kind. A drive by kind. It is possible to grow and still be alone; that is not growth, that is inflation.
Dark patterns do not make you evil, they make you sloppy
At some point I noticed an account doing the follow and unfollow dance. Follow a lot of people quickly, trigger reciprocity, harvest follow backs, unfollow to keep ratios pretty, repeat.
It works because humans are polite. That is the uncomfortable truth. Reciprocity is a feature in us, and when you notice that, you get offered a fork. One path is to pretend you never saw it. The other path is to become the kind of person who justifies anything because “it works”. Most people do not consciously choose the second path. They slide into it because they are tired, invisible, or confusing attention with dignity.
The danger is not that the tactic is spammy. The danger is what it trains inside you. You become someone who sees people as levers, and once you do that long enough, you lose the ability to build real supporters because you stopped treating supporters as real.
The Solution (The Calm Way)
The calm way is not “be ethical”. That is too vague to be useful. The calm way is to design a system that makes ethics the default because it is aligned with the outcome you actually want. Not numbers. Resonance.
Reframe: follow as an invitation, not a tactic
When I was at my most confused, I followed like I was throwing flyers off a bridge. Maybe someone catches one. Maybe they do not. That is not an invitation; that is litter.
An invitation has three properties: it is specific, it is contextual, and it respects the other person’s attention. This is why direct messaging, done carefully, worked better than any broad gesture ever did. Not templated blasts, not “check my new track bro”. Personal notes. Reference a track you genuinely liked. Reference a comment they wrote. Reflect back what you heard. Ask a human question.
It did not scale. That was the point. It created a first layer of real relationships, a tiny room within the bigger room.
Use networks, not individuals
Then came repost channels, curators, labels that primarily distributed rather than produced. At first, this felt like corruption. Gatekeepers. Middlemen. Later it felt like a realistic description of how attention moves in any crowded ecosystem.
People trust taste. Curators are taste bundles. You can resent that or you can learn from it. The operator move here is to build a map, not an obsession. A map.
Who reposts what kind of sound? What do they ask for when you submit? Do they credit artists properly? Do they seem to cultivate a scene, or are they vending impressions? You are not trying to “hack” them. You are trying to locate where your music fits, and where it does not. Alignment is a targeting problem.
Timing is a form of respect
Here is a small, almost silly truth: your likelihood of being noticed goes up when the other person is online. That is not manipulation. That is basic human reality.
Social platforms collapse distance, but they do not eliminate time. People still have lives. They still sleep. They still get overloaded. When I started paying attention to temporal presence, my outreach stopped feeling like shouting into a canyon. It started feeling like knocking on a door when someone is home. There is a difference between interruption and contact. One is about you. The other is about the moment.
Tools are not the sin, intent is
When SoundCloud opened up API access, it became possible to build a system around the room: watchlists, filters, signals, small automations that saved time. This is where people panic about morality. Automation feels like cheating.
But the real moral line is not “did you automate”. The line is “did you remove care”. If your system helps you find better matches and show up more thoughtfully, it is a prosthetic for attention. If your system helps you blast more people with less thought, it is a prosthetic for spam. The same tool. Two different humans.
A small operator playbook for social platforms
If you want to treat SoundCloud, or any platform, like an operator, try this:
-
Define your real outcome.
- Not followers.
- Not plays.
- Something like: “ten people who comment because they listened, not because they are polite.”
-
Pick one constraint that protects your integrity.
- For example: “I will not message anyone about a track I did not listen to.”
-
Run small experiments, not lifestyle changes.
- One week of thoughtful DMs.
- One month of targeted curator submissions.
- Two releases where you only engage inside a narrow scene.
-
Keep a simple log.
- What did I do?
- What happened?
- What surprised me?
- What did it cost in energy?
-
Treat misalignment as data, not rejection.
- People who unfollow after a release are not “haters”.
- They are your system telling you your targeting was off.
This is calmer than chasing reach because it turns the platform from a slot machine into a lab. It gives you agency, and agency is the antidote to the need for hacks.
Presence beats reach. Reach is how far you can travel. Presence is how deeply you are allowed to stay.
Conclusion
If you only remember one thing, let it be this: platforms amplify what you already are. If you are consistent, they amplify consistency. If you are sloppy, they amplify sloppiness. If you are generous, they amplify generosity. If you are desperate, they amplify desperation.
The operator mindset is not about winning the platform. It is about not being changed by it. This is why I care about presence. Presence is not a growth strategy; it is a character strategy, and it has a side effect. People start to recognize you. Not your numbers. You.
If that sounds abstract, good. It should. The moment you turn it into a formula, you will be tempted to mass produce it. And mass produced presence is just reach wearing a nicer outfit.
If you are in a season that feels uncertain, where the silence from the room starts messing with your head, you are not alone in that either. I have been there, and I wrote about the psychology of uncertainty, comfort, and self inflicted narratives in The Pandemic of “uncertain”.
The best part about a room is that you can always choose how you enter it. Quietly. Clearly. With intention. And then you can stay long enough to be seen.